UGC contest: the entry routes, deadlines and winner rules organisers publish
A UGC contest asks the public to submit photos, captions or builds, and each organiser's own page sets the deadline. Stars and Stripes Pacific takes photos through October 4, 2026, PhotoPlace Gallery closes October 5, the American Kennel Club takes entries through October 31, and Engineering News-Record's regular deadline is November 16. Entry runs through a form, an upload tool, email or post.
Prepared by ContestsOnline editorial desk — Revised
The New Yorker's weekly caption competition and its five stages
The caption contest New Yorker readers enter each week has run since 2005, and at any given moment five rounds are active, each at a different weekly stage between submission and announcement.
Readers submit captions online, then rate other readers' captions on a three-step scale from funny to unfunny. An algorithm helps sort the rated captions, and editors select the finalists from the top hundred reader rankings. Readers then vote on the finalists, and the winner is decided entirely by reader votes.
The design gives each stage one job: entry, rating, an editorial cut, a vote, an announcement. The pages checked do not say how the magazine screens ratings or votes, and this handbook does not guess.
Cartoons, images and photographs as caption prompts
A caption-less cartoon is the prompt in the New Yorker's version, and the caption is the entry. In a caption contest images set the prompt in the same way, and the organiser decides whether entrants caption a picture the organiser supplies or submit a picture of their own.
In a caption contest photos work like cartoons, with one difference: the organiser owns or licenses the picture, so the rules have to say where the photographs come from. The pages checked document no photo caption event; the photo calls in the table collect the entrants' own pictures instead.
Hashtag and comment competitions: entry by post instead of by form
The pages checked document neither format, so what follows is mechanics, not published examples. A hashtag contest counts a public post that carries a tag; a comment contest counts a reply under a post. In both, the platform holds the entry and the organiser holds only the rules that say which posts count.
Because the entry lives on a platform, two rules matter more than they do for a form: the organiser has to name the account, the post or the tag exactly, and has to say what happens to an entry that is deleted before the draw. A social media contest picker draws from the comments or posts it is pointed at, and how the draw was made belongs in the rules whichever tool does it.
A caption contest Reddit thread is a comment format in this sense: the captions are comments, the subreddit's own rules apply, and the pages checked document no such thread.
Platform rules: what YouTube allows an organiser to run
YouTube does not allow contests to be run through ad units, and it allows them through content on the platform if they follow its listed rules. For a caption contest YouTube therefore means a video that carries the prompt and the entry instructions, and the organiser reads the listed rules before building it.
The PUBG entry rules show the same pattern from the entrant's side: entries must use the official PUBG UGC Mod tools and the supported submission flow, and go through the official form during the contest period. A platform's rules narrow the organiser's choices before the organiser's own rules begin.
A UGC contest with a partner platform: the PUBG map-building example
PUBG's UGC Contest is a global open event with a prize pool stated in US dollars, run with CurseForge as the event's partner. CurseForge says it is running the UGC mod map-building contest for PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS in partnership with KRAFTON Inc., and the submission side is handled entirely on CurseForge's platform.
PUBG says its contest page holds the full details, including how to submit, category guidelines, prize details and the FAQ, and participants complete the official entry form. The announcement sits with PUBG, the submission with the platform partner and the rules on one page; a UGC contest with two organisations still needs one place that lists everything an entrant must do.
The office: staff caption events and a television reference
A caption contest office episode is a scripted television scene, and none of the sources checked for this handbook documents it as an organiser's event. It has no rules page, no deadline and no prize an entrant can claim.
An employer who runs a caption contest the office can enter needs the same things as any organiser: a stated deadline, a stated way of choosing the winner and a prize the rules describe. Whether staff vote, a manager decides or a panel judges is the organiser's choice, and the rules say which; they should also say whether managers can enter.
Choosing winners and delivering prizes: the parts a rules page settles
Cartoon caption contest winners at The New Yorker are decided entirely by reader votes, but only after ratings and an editorial cut have reduced the field to finalists. A UGC contest that mixes public votes with a judging step states in its rules which step is binding.
Choosing the winner is half the job. The rules also say how each winner is notified, how long the winner has to claim the prize, and what happens to a prize that goes unclaimed, and they say who deals with any tax on the prize, because that depends on the prize and on where the winner lives.
The prize side differs across the sources. PUBG's entry page states a prize pool in US dollars and points to its contest page for prize details; the New Yorker pages checked describe the winner and no prize. An organiser publishes the prize in the same place as the entry route.
Who owns the entries, and what the law and the rules leave open
The law looks at how a winner is chosen: chance, judgment and public vote each carry their own rules, and the rules differ again from one country or state to the next. A format that asks entrants to pay for a chance is the one to raise with a lawyer first. The pages checked name no governing law for any example here, so the organiser's lawyer, not this handbook, settles it before launch.
The pages checked do not say who owns a submission or how an organiser can reuse it, in advertising or anywhere else. Ownership and the licence an entrant grants belong in the official rules, in plain words, before the first entry arrives; YouTube's ad-unit rule concerns where a competition can run and says nothing about reusing entries.
Disqualification rests on the rules the organiser publishes: the grounds for removing an entry and the person who decides go in the text released before entries open. A doubtful entry is judged against those rules; nothing on the pages checked says how The New Yorker, PUBG or any other organiser screens entries or votes, so this handbook draws no conclusion about whether any check catches a fake.
| Entry call | Organiser | Entry route and dates |
|---|---|---|
| Share Your Paradise | Stars and Stripes Pacific | Photo entries through a promotional survey link by 11:59 PM JST on October 4, 2026. |
| 20th photo edition | SEARCA | Official website from 16 July to 30 September 2026, 11:59 p.m. GMT+8. |
| The Human Experience | PhotoPlace Gallery | A photography call with a submission deadline of October 5, 2026. |
| Year in Construction photos | Engineering News-Record | Readers submit construction photos; the regular deadline is November 16, 2026. |
| Nature photography competition | Glanzlichter | Opens October 1, 2026; entrants register and upload images, and participation is online only. |
| Nature photo call | Not named in the sources checked | Submissions in as many categories as an entrant wants until November 15, 2026. |
| 2026 photo call | American Kennel Club | Starts April 27, 2026; entries by email or post, postmarked by October 31, 2026. |
| Photography competition | Anthology | Entries through November 30, 2026 in the period the organiser calls standard. |
| UGC Contest | PUBG with CurseForge and KRAFTON Inc. | Official entry form and the official PUBG UGC Mod tools; full details sit on the event page. |
| Cartoon Caption Contest | The New Yorker | Weekly; captions are submitted online, rated, cut to finalists and put to a reader vote. |
Procedure
-
Submission kind named
State what entrants send: a photograph, a caption or a built project. The published examples cover photographs, captions and a mod map, and each one tells entrants exactly which file or text the organiser accepts.
-
A single submission route
Name one way to submit: a survey link, an official website, an online upload tool, an official entry form, or email and post. The examples use each of these, and Glanzlichter states that participation is only possible online.
-
Deadline set with time and time zone
Give the closing moment, not only the day. Stars and Stripes Pacific closes at 11:59 PM JST on October 4, 2026, and SEARCA closes at 11:59 p.m. GMT+8 on September 30, 2026.
-
Who picks the winner, settled early
Decide whether judges, editors, public votes or a mix choose the winner. The New Yorker collects ratings, cuts to finalists and then lets readers vote, and the rules for a UGC contest state which step is final.
-
Platform rules read first
Read the host platform's contest rules before building the entry flow. YouTube does not allow contests through ad units but allows them through content that follows its listed rules, and PUBG's entry rules require the official mod tools.
Readers ask
What is a UGC contest?
A UGC contest asks participants to submit content they made themselves, such as photographs, captions or game maps, and a judge, an editor or the public chooses the winners. PUBG's UGC Contest is a mod map-building example run with CurseForge, and the photo calls in the table collect entrants' own pictures.
How do I run a successful social media contest?
A social media contest holds up when four choices are written down first: what entrants send, how they send it, when entry closes and who picks the winner. The published examples state each one, from a survey link or upload tool to a deadline with a time zone, and leave the rest to a rules page.
Can I accept photo and video submissions?
The photo calls in the sources accept photographs through a survey link, a website, an online upload tool, or email and post, and none of the pages checked describes a video route. A video entry writes its own rules for file type, length and hosting, and where the video is posted decides which platform rules apply.
Can I run a hashtag contest?
The pages checked document no hashtag format, so the answer rests on mechanics: entry is a public post carrying a tag. The organiser's rules name the tag, the dates and what counts as a valid post. The platform's own terms apply as well, and YouTube's contest rules show how a platform limits the format.
Can I let the public vote?
The New Yorker's caption contest does: readers vote on finalists and the winner is decided entirely by reader votes, but only after ratings and an editorial cut have narrowed the field. A public vote needs a rule on what counts as a vote and who decides a tie, and the pages checked do not say how the magazine screens votes.
How do I pick winners?
Pick winners by the method the rules state, and state it before entries open. The New Yorker rates entries, cuts to the top hundred, has editors select finalists and then counts reader votes; a social media contest picker that draws at random from comments is a different method, and the rules name whichever is used.
Do I own the content that participants submit?
The pages checked do not say who owns a submission, so ownership is a question for the official rules: they state whether entrants keep their work and what licence they give the organiser. A lawyer reads that wording before launch.
Can I use contest submissions in paid advertising?
The pages checked do not address reusing entries in advertising, so the licence in the official rules decides it. YouTube's ad-unit rule concerns where an event can run, and it says nothing about using entries in a paid advert. An organiser who plans advertising asks for that permission in the entry terms.
Notes and sources
- akc.org. akc.org/products-services/magazines/family-dog/photo-contest/.
- mod.curseforge.com. mod.curseforge.com/pubg/battleground-ugc-contest/tos/.
- newyorker.com. newyorker.com/humor.
- newyorker.com. newyorker.com/newsletter/the-daily/how-to-win-our-cartoon-caption-contest.
- reCAPTCHA. support.google.com/youtube/answer/1620498.
Nothing here is legal advice, and whether a competition can run, and on what terms, in a given country or state is a question for a lawyer there. The handbook reports what organisers and platforms published; it cannot see any organiser's entry counts or vote screening, does not rank the examples, and never predicts a win. Entry rules, judging and disqualification stay with each organiser.
Woobox's user terms require entrants to agree to the organiser's official rules, so any limit on bought or incentivised votes depends on the particular contest. Walmart's Associate Talent Search rules prohibit paying for votes and let Walmart void fraudulent votes or disqualify the entrant. The platform's terms and the organiser's rules are two documents, and a disqualification is decided under the second.
Woobox lists three warning signs of bought votes: many votes from one IP address, votes from people in different countries and regular voting intervals. Award Force says its platform detects and blocks automated or scripted voting and rate-limits rapid voting. Ordinary participation is uneven in time and independent in origin, so it shows none of those patterns; this describes how checks read a count and is not a method for passing one.
In the United States, the FTC says a sweepstakes cannot require a purchase to enter, and California says a sweepstakes must offer a way to enter without cost. Those rules concern sweepstakes entry, not votes: whether a contest allows paid votes is written in its own rules, and ViralSweep even lets organisers configure Pay to Vote. Contests whose rules bar outside votes are refused, and so are political ballots.
Once voting closes, a refund applies where votes ordered for a contest never appear in the count the contest itself displays. ViralSweep says its protections may silently flag and block a vote, and Woobox says votes from IP addresses it has flagged as fraudulent do not count even when the voter appears to have succeeded, so the displayed count is the test. An organiser's ruling or a disqualification is never refunded, and neither is an account ban such as the permanent one Gleam says a breach of its terms may bring.